Saturday, May 15, 2010

Composite Bonding vs Invisalign?

I went to the dentist today for a consulation, my intentions were to get composite bonding for a few spaces in my front teeth, but my dentist referred me to a orthodontist and said a better option for me was to get invisalign, because I have a slight overbite and I would have a perfect smile for a lifetime instead of spending thousands of dollars every 5-7 yrs for bonding. I have researched invisalign and I really don't want to wait 18 months to see an improvement in my smile. The disadvantages like having a lisp for a few weeks, discomfort, not being able to chew gum and having to avoid certain foods are just too unbearable. What do you think the best choice is?

Composite Bonding vs Invisalign?
i went to the dentist about a week ago and i asked about invisalign and he told me that i would have to stay commited to it because i dont really have to have braces or anything and i would have to wear them for 20 hours every day! they do give good results but u would have to wear them for a long time! hope this helps!
Reply:THE BEST CHOICE W/ALL HE OPTIONS IS TRADITIONAL BRACES. THE COST IS A LOT LESS THAN INVISALIGN AND YOU CAN EAT WITH THIS.


INVISALIGN MAY TAKE 6-8 MONTHS AND NOT AS LONG AS YOU IMAGINE. BRACES NOT BONDING WHICH MAY NEED REDOING EVERY FEW YEARS.

computer security

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

 
vc .net